Superintendent’s Blog

    This post has been designed to answer questions that the community may have regarding school related issues.  If you have a question about school operations; policy, budget, future plans or anything similar that you would like to see answered in a public forum, you may mail, email or call me with your question.  If you would prefer to remain anonymous, please make that request.

    Although there is no such thing as a bad question, certain questions may not be addressed, specifically questions that deal with individual students or individual personnel.  It would be unethical to discuss these topics in a public forum.  These are also considered to be confidential topics according to state law.

    Gossip and hearsay are damaging to our school.  It is my hope that this “blog” will address some of the rumors that are typical in every community and that it will set the facts straight.  We don’t claim to be perfect but we do make every effort to be open and honest regarding our school business.  My hope is that this “blog” can prevent us from getting sidetracked so we can stay focused on our mission of educating our students.

    My contact information is: Tom Bean ISD

    attn/Kelly Lusk

    P.O Box 128

    Tom Bean, Tx 75489



  • Thank you First Baptist Church-Tom Bean

    Posted by Kelly Lusk on 11/16/2017

    I just wanted to publicly thank FBC-Tom Bean for adopting our teachers and staff and praying for us. Your prayers are appreciated. We thank you. As we move towards the Thanksgiving Break, I am thankful that, regardless of our faults and shortcomings, you chose to be positive and build us up.

    Comments (-1)
  • New School Year

    Posted by Kelly Lusk on 8/28/2017

    August 26, 2017  -   I appreciate the welcome that I have received in Tom Bean.  All have been kind and I want to say thank you.

    In the fall of 1990, I began my career in education and I have looked forward to the first day of school every year.  This year is no different.  I’m looking forward to all of our Tomcats and Lady Tomcats returning Monday morning.  After all, the students are the reason all of us come together to provide the best school system we can possibly create.

    I must admit that this year I have grave concerns.  While those of us in Tom Bean are working to create the best for our students.  There are many in Austin who are working against our kids.  For the last 10 or more years there has been a movement in the state to eliminate public schools.  It started slowly at first but has slowly gathered steam and has found itself entrenched in the state Senate.

    Make no mistake.  Many in the state Senate want to twist the public school system into one that no longer serves all of the students of our state.  Their goal is to defund public education by funneling tax dollars towards private schools, by way of vouchers, and towards privately controlled corporations, by way of charter schools.

    I have always been a person that has understood that our public schools will never be funded as they should.  There are only so many tax dollars and there are many needs across the state.  We are a public entity and we will sometimes just have to do without and make due with what we have.  Even as our current legislative special session just closed, I feel no ill will that, although we have added hundreds of thousands of students, we will be operating the public schools with less money per student than we had in 2003.  Texas ranks 46th in the country in funding for public schools.  But, “It is what it is,” and our Texas public schools will get it done.  

    What does raise my eyebrows is that I thought I would never see the day when our schools would be attacked by the leaders of our state but, unfortunately, that day has come.

    Maybe I’m old fashioned but I just can’t reconcile myself as to why anyone would want our local tax dollars, collected to support a system of public schools for all children, to be funneled away to a privately held charter school corporation that is not accountable to the local taxpayer.  Charter schools use a similar per student funding system and thus do not save the state a penny.  It is my opinion that by setting up an alternative system of education neither system can reach its full potential.  There is no room in the state budget for both and the two systems will work against one another.  My opinion is that a profit driven corporate school will not be capable of making the best decision for students when it affects the bottom line, especially higher need special education students.

    So, the question for you to answer is:  Do you want the students of Tom Bean educated by a corporation with a home office in Dallas, Houston or New York?  Or do you want the school to be run by a locally elected school board with roots in Tom Bean.  Do you want the decisions on how to spend your tax dollars made by people you elect or by people who have no connection to Tom Bean?  Would you rather have your tax dollars spent in Tom Bean or funneled into the pockets of privately held corporations and foundations?

    I’ve never claimed to be perfect but I have dedicated my life to serving the public schools of our communities and it pains me to watch slick politicians in Austin spread misinformation about public education.  I have done my best to serve ALL of our students, regardless of who they were or where they came from, and treated them as equals.  While at school I consider them my children.  I take it personal when the Lt. Governor labels me an “educrat.”  I’m just a small-town guy who has chosen to dedicate my career to kids.  Don’t label me an educrat.  I am an educator and I’m proud of it.

    Our Lt. Governor recently compared the Speaker of the House to someone who would have sneaked out of the Alamo.  As a history teacher, I see a different point of view.  I see the Speaker of the House as the defender of the Alamo against Santa Anna and the State Senate, who came to rape, pillage and burn our public schools.

    Unless changes are made at the legislative level, specifically the state Senate, our public schools, including Tom Bean, will cease to exist.

    The following is a letter written by Laura Yeager from the Texas Association of Community Schools (TACS).  I think it sums up the feelings of those of us who support our children and have watched our State Senate work to dismantle our public school system (My highlights).  Take care and God Bless.


    I am sad, disappointed, and above all, I am angry. Chairman Dan Huberty is disappointed, and the 5.4 million students in Texas public schools, their parents, the taxpayers who fund the schools, and the 700,000 Texans working in Texas public schools should be angry too. The Texas Senate shortchanged our kids again and we should be outraged all the way to the voting booth.  On Tuesday night, the House of Representatives knuckled under and accepted the Senate’s committee substitute of HB 21, which originally was a school finance bill. In the end, it helps retired teachers with health insurance costs, helps many ASATR districts, and will help a small number of students with disabilities get some extra resources. It also will eliminate the small school penalty. Still, it is nothing compared to what the House bill would have done.

    When HB 21 was voted out of the House August 7th, 2017 (130-13) it would have infused $1.8 billion into the public education system, including a $210 per WADA increase to the basic allotment that would help just about every student in the state. It also had a good chunk of money to help districts facing hardships from the expiration of ASATR, a new dyslexia weight, a slightly increased weight for bilingual education, increased CTE funding, and more. The Senate version of HB 21 introduced last Friday, August 11th, slashed $1.5 billion from the bill, had ZERO increase in the basic allotment, no increased weights, and no other systemic changes. The Senate’s HB 21 provides $311 million, including $150 million for ASATR hardship grants over the next two years, $41 million to slowly phase out the small school penalty, $60 million for charter facilities funding, $60 million for traditional public schools’ facilities funding via the EDA, and $40 million for two two-year grant programs for dyslexic and autistic children. The Senate craftily threw in the $212 million for retired teachers so the House couldn’t easily say no to this pittance of a bill. By countering with this bill, the Senate, Lieutenant Governor, and Governor showed loud and clear that they do not support public education and that they do not intend to fund it. Additionally, instead of using money from the bulging “Rainy Day Fund,” the Senate chose to take money from already cash-strapped Medicaid programs serving our poorest children.

    When HB 21 was finally heard on the Senate floor late on Sunday night (after the Senate had pushed the proverbial snooze alarm countless times during the weekend), many Democratic senators proposed updating the weights for educating bilingual students, and increasing the basic allotment that would grow the pie for all students and districts. Chairman Taylor replied repeatedly that the system is broken and that he doesn’t want to add money he can’t take away. He explained that the Senate sees HB 21 as a 2-year bridge until their “commission” can come up with a new way to approach school finance. Senators Van Taylor, Huffines, Hall, and others spent much of the evening praising efficiency and competition, charter schools, home schools, and private schools. They said that they want to see which programs are working and then just fund those rather than funding all.

    I am extremely grateful to Chairman Huberty, the House Public Education Committee, and above all to Speaker Straus for focusing on what is important–investing in and educating our children. While 95% of Texas kids go to underfunded and micromanaged public schools, the state has continued to reduce its percentage contribution to public education year after year and forced a growing tax burden on local taxpayers while not even spending those funds for education. The House acknowledged this reality and grappled with real solutions.

    I was hopeful on Saturday when Rep. Phil King, the House sponsor of the commission on public school finance bill, allowed a number of excellent amendments that would guide the commission to study the important questions like how much should we be paying to educate our kids? How much more does it cost to educate students with various needs? Amendments also broadened the list of who would serve on the commission including additional educators, and it would have required the commission to hold open meetings. Unfortunately, since the Senate rolled SB 16, Chairman Taylor’s public education finance commission bill into HB 21, it reverts to the Senate version that requires none of the good things listed above.

    Wednesday morning, Governor Abbott was on a radio program where he explained that the school finance commission will act like an ISD sunset commission. As one could predict based on Chairman Taylor’s comments, they see the commission not as a way to improve how we fund our schools, but as a chance to determine if we should even have public schools as we know them or if there is a more “efficient” and “effective” way to deliver education at a lower cost.

    In my humble opinion, our kids are not widgets and their education is not where we should be scrimping. The view that education is a business and that we should have competition, winners, and losers, doesn’t make sense in the provision of a common good. If that is how we choose to approach education, then our democracy is headed to a much faster demise than I imagined.  There has been an intentional creation of a scarcity mindset by leaders who don’t support public education, who prefer to see it as a business, and maybe even have some friends who will profit off this growing industry. By cutting funding and increasing the hoops through which public schools must jump, would-be education allies are forced to fight against each other for limited resources. Representative Senfronia Thompson hit on this when she described what was wrong with the Senate’s version of HB 21. “In this bill, they (the Senate) are pitting children against children, school districts against school districts, and teachers against children.” For years, they have pitted rural against urban, poor against rich, parents against districts, and teachers against kids by limiting vital resources. This is how you cut the knees off your opponents. Force them to fight amongst themselves while you make off with the goodies. I have a friend who grew up extremely poor. She had many siblings and they were always hungry. One of her brothers died unexpectedly and the family was heartbroken. However, with one fewer person at the dinner table, she sometimes got to eat a whole egg, instead of just part of one. Her story stayed with me and reminds me of what our leaders are doing to our public schools. By making us all fight for every last resource, we get distracted from our common goal of electing leaders who will invest in our students, our public schools, and the future of the great state of Texas.

    The fact that educators are getting organized, rallying, and talking about voting out legislators and statewide leaders who are anti-public ed, spurred the Senate to add some money for retired teachers. (It also got bills on the call aimed at keeping teachers from organizing.) What it didn’t get us was more money for all the kids and all the schools. This is the time for the education community to come together, to register and to vote for leaders who will support public education and the children who are our future. Many thanks for your continued dedication to serving all children and being on the front lines with them no matter what odds you face and what limited resources you are given.

    Respectfully, Laura Yeager

    TACS Governmental Affairs


    Comments (-1)
  • Cafeteria

    Posted by Kelly Lusk on 2/14/2017

    February 14, 2017  - I received a few questions regarding the school cafeteria at the “Meet the Superintendent” night about the requirements and/or restrictions in the school cafeteria. 

    I will attempt to answer these questions and expand a little bit on them in as brief a manner as possible.  Please understand that I am summarizing a manual that is hundreds of pages long.  For more information on school lunch regulations, you may go to squaremeals.org or contact our Food Services Director, Flo Penrod.

      As most of you know, the school receives a substantial amount of money from the federal government, Tom Bean has budgeted approximately $232,000 this year, to assist in funding the school breakfast and lunch program.  The USDA places guidelines on the types of foods that are allowed to be served, how the foods are to be prepared and the amount to be served on each plate as well as numerous other guidelines and restrictions, including any type of food or snack that is distributed or sold by school personnel at any time during the school day.  Unfortunately, this also includes items that are sold as fundraisers by different school organizations.  Our cafeteria director and our administrators are responsible for following these rules.  Our school food service department is audited on a regular basis and also may be “spot checked” at any time.  If we as a school are found to be not following the guidelines, penalties will be imposed.  Schools may lose the funding provided for that day’s breakfasts and lunches, or more severe fines that could be in the thousands or tens of thousands of dollars.

    Please understand that we do not always agree with each of these regulations but that we are attempting to do our job as best we can to prevent the school from receiving a fine or a loss of revenue, which we use to provide the best possible breakfast and lunch that we can for our students.  We attempt to use common sense as best we can to deal with these issues, but the risk of losing funds is real.  I have known multiple schools in the area from which I came were fined and/or lost some funding as a result of not following the guidelines imposed by the federal government.  

    I would like to give you one example of how our local schools have to deal with these regulations.  At my previous school, we hosted an annual basketball tournament. The first game of the tournament tipped off at 8:30 a.m.  At some point during the day each of the grade levels were allowed to watch a game.  Many of our younger students had never attended a basketball game so we took this opportunity to expose them athletic contests.  

    Like most schools we had a concession stand available for the teams and fans.  It was important for those teams for us to cook burgers and have something for the visiting players and fans.  There was nowhere in our community where these folks could get anything to eat for 15 miles and that was in the wrong direction for the traveling teams.  Unfortunately, our students were not allowed to purchase items out of the concession stand.  Rule 26.11 in the school lunch manual states that:  the concession stand is considered to be “in competition” with the school lunch program.  Elementary students may not be served a competitive food or have indirect access to a competitive food during the school day, junior high students may not have access to these competitive foods from 30 minutes before their lunch period to 30 minutes after their lunch period, and high school students may not have access to these competitive foods during their lunch period in the cafeteria.  So therefore, we allowed the high school students to

    purchase items out of the concession stand since it wasn’t in the cafeteria, the junior high students could purchase items after 1:30 but the elementary school students were not allowed to purchase items until after school had been released.  

    The guidelines for the School Lunch Program are constantly changing.  We make every effort to keep our parents informed of these regulations.  As rules change and we become more familiar with them we will distribute the regulations through the campuses.  If you have any questions about the school lunch guidelines, please contact your campus principal.

    Comments (-1)
  • Dress Code

    Posted by Kelly Lusk on 2/6/2017

    February 6, 2017 – I had several calls last week regarding the dress code, specifically at the high school.  Parents had heard a few different things regarding the dress code so I am going to combine those questions into one response and address them.

                Sweats/Sweatsuits.  I know that multiple teachers have asked Mrs. McCarty to enforce the dress code on a more consistent basis so she and I have discussed this issue since my arrival.  She/we have not changed the dress code in any way.  It is my understanding that sweats/sweatsuits are allowed to be worn by students according to the Tom Bean dress code.  If a teacher informed your child that she could not wear sweats, the teacher was mistaken.  If your child heard this from other sources, they were mistaken.  

    Ponytails.  The dress code does state that ponytails MAY be considered a distraction.  It leaves the interpretation of this up to the principal of the campus.  Personally, I don't know that I've ever seen a girl’s ponytail be a distraction deserving of the hair being cut off, but I do know it could be a possibility.  For example, an elementary student that continually wiggles/wags her head to hit students with her hair while in line or flips it into another student's tray at lunch.  I have seen students do this but once corrected by the teacher, they have stopped.  If there were continual problems, it could be a possibility that the principal would ask the parent to shorten the hair.  Once again, I've never seen that happen but I suppose that it could.

    Since there has been a lot of misinformation floating around the high school, Mrs. McCarty had already planned to address the dress code issue with students.  I am sure she will meet with the students very soon.  Our goal is not to change the dress code but just to enforce it on a consistent basis so student dress is not a distraction in the classroom.

    Comments (-1)